HUMAN ATTACK- SAVE THE SHARKS !

HUMAN ATTACK- SAVE THE SHARKS !
http://cynicismcentral.org/node/52

Sharks and harmless marine life are already being culled unnecessarily , get rid of the nets and drumlines!

With a number of shark attacks around the country in the last couple of weeks in WA, Tas and NSW have come calls from some in the community for a shark cull. There have been anecdotal claims of increased shark sightings.

This is despite the fact that sharks are long maturing and long lived creatures and are subject to massive fishing pressures . So much so that the Qld government is reducing the allowable commercial shark take in Qld waters by 1/3 and are limiting the maximum size to 1.5 meters. And we are talking about a number in the hundreds of tonnes for Qld alone.

In Townsville , drumlines appear off Kissing Point (The Strand) and Palleranda . On Magnetic Island nets and drumlines appear at Picnic Bay, Nelly Bay , Alma Bay , Florence Bay , Horseshoe Bay and Radical Bay (1) .

It was reported (2) that in the 3 months to January there has been a massive increase in large sharks killed by nets and drumlines in the Townsville area. The figures on the QLD DPI website (3) shows 35 and 34 sharks over 2 meters caught in the Townsville area on drumlines or in the nets for the 06-07 and 07-08 years respectively. I would hesitate to accept the large numbers alluded to by the media over 3 months without proof.

The numbers for all sharks caught in the program for those years were 40 and 88 respectively. When all of the figures are looked at -the numbers for sharks killed around the state for no valid reason is astonishing.

The figures show a decline of shark numbers per se since the programme was introduced. The system itself is a cull.

This is despite the fact that there have been recent revelations that there are possible non lethal methods of “deterring” sharks (4) .

The revelations indicate that the shark nets and drumlines which infest our coast , and kill all manner of harmless species might not be necessary at all . The recent research shows that magnets can repel sharks.

It is well known that electromagnetic measures may be used against sharks , but just as the fact that nets only go to 6 meters depth attests , and that a tiger or great white may attack regardless shows , we are already facing the dangers being protected against .In fact the current system cannot be regarded as a preventative approach.The Qld Government is not trying to prevent shark access to beaches but merely to reduce the numbers of “resident” sharks (5) .

There has also been previous research into alternatives to the current methods. The South African Natal Sharks Board had a patent for numerous devices including an electromagnetic “plane” or “shark wall” that repels sharks and keeps them away from a particular area as if a net (6). This patent has been ceded to a South Australian company.

It may well be that electromagnetic devices in conjunction with aerial surveillance by ultra-lite aircraft or light helicopters has the potential to replace the current wasteful system of beach protection. Increased marine surveillance may be beneficial in other areas as well to earn its keep.

There are signs warning about crocs here, and we know the risks yet swim anyway unless there is a sighting.

The recent research shows that it may be possible that we don’t need to kill harmless marine creatures to prevent attack by sharks .If there is the will, then money can be put towards research that would repel sharks from bathing beaches, and also could provide an economic benefit to Queenslanders through exporting our technology.

I believe that either our council or the state or Federal Government could invest in shark repelling technology and provide a return for Townsville and wider the Australian community.

The indiscriminate killing of marine wildlife in the shark control program must cease immediately (7).

We need to rid Townsville and Magnetic Island of the murderously inappropriate drumlines and shark nets.

The Qld government is not doing enough to investigate or research alternative non-lethal methods of shark control. It is reported that it is currently spending less than $100 000 in each contract area where nets and drumlines are used and are trialling the use of sonic “pingers” and acoustic devices to warn away dolphins and whales from nets around the gold coast (8).

The Qld program has been shown to affect no less than 45 species of sharks including Whale Sharks and other harmless sharks, 17 species of Rays, Sawfishes, Stingarees and Stingrays, 7 species of Dolphin and whales, all six Australian Sea Turtle Species, Dugong , Crocodile , and 22 other fish and crustacean species (9) .

Baited drumlines actually attract sharks to a particular area and also hook turtles- that even if released have in many cases been found dead later. And, if tagged have been shown not to have turned up later at their nesting sites.

The nets affect the humpback whale (vulnerable) migration . All six turtles are either listed as vulnerable or endangered (10) , and the growing consensus is that dugong and sharks are already in massive decline (11) .

In Townsville, we have the incredible situation where, on the Strand (Townsville’s showpiece main beach area) there are 2 public fishing facilities at the Rock pool and the Strand pier - that have fish cleaning tables with pipes, that drop fish guts and carcasses etc straight into the water within a hundred metres of the beach, and also close to the drum lines.

Best practice is not to have such material being deposited close to places where people frequent . It would be even smarter to consider whether this has the ability to lure sharks and other creatures like crocodiles to their deaths.

Though the federal government has previously refused to say that the program on its own -is a key threatening process that would trigger the protection mechanisms in the Environmental Protection Biodiversity and Conservation Act (EPBC Act), it’s obvious it is part of the cumulative impacts on all species that are affected by it and that are in decline. The current program is an indiscriminate waste of marine life.

Whereas with the turtle nesting season and increased sightings of whales during the migration season being a potential boost to the tourist economy, maintaining the current system of beach protection may be a liability .

Humankind has previously conquered its fear of the unknown and has placed men on the moon, surely we are intelligent enough to manage our fears of sharing the oceans with other creatures which do not see us the top of the food chain. We do not use drumlines for crocs yet swim regardless.

It is quite possible that the Townsville City Council or the state labor, or federal labor government can fund research and trials of such devices in our area.

Although this is a highly emotive and politically sensitive issue, it cannot hurt for a start -to trial devices or a new device on local shark nets. If no sharks get caught in the nets it will give a good indication that the technology has a sound basis. The Qld Government is only “monitoring” such advances in technology and is not “investing” in it.

The fact is though, nobody is game enough to tell people what they don’t want to hear, that the current methods of shark control are only a feel good measure. A political rather than a safety necessity .

Pat Coleman

(1) http://www2.dpi.qld.gov.au/extra/pdf/fishweb/sharkbrochure.pdf

(2) Ch7 Townsville local 6pm TV news 12/1/09

(3) http://www.oesr.qld.gov.au/queensland-by-theme/industry/agriculture-fore...

(4) ch10 QLD 5pm news 24/7/08 and ch7 local TSV 6pm 24/7/08 see also the articles found at the following search link : http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=sharks+%2B+magnets&btnG=Google+S...

(5) http://www2.dpi.qld.gov.au/extra/pdf/fishweb/sharksafetyreport.pdf

(6) For Instance see http://www.elasmo-research.org/education/white_shark/deterrents.htm , The Natal Shark Board Australian Patent for Electromagnetic Shark Repelling Devices http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2003011025&IA=WO2003011025&DISPLA... , Shark Sheild http://www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s1196755.htm ,see also http://www.kfd.com.au/prod_shark.php ,
http://www.prodivingservices.com.au/page.php?ID=209&action=expand&show=1 , http://www.sharkshield.com/Content/Home/ , You Tube TV Segments on repelling devices http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSWb0w5DxnU , Natal Sharks Board Shark POD http://www.shark.co.za/repel.htm .
(7) General Links:
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=repel+sharks+%2B+electric&btnG=G... , http://www.google.com.au/search?q=shark+control+%2B+Townsville&hl=en&sta...

(8) For Instance See http://www2.dpi.qld.gov.au/extra/pdf/fishweb/sharkbrochure.pdf , QLD DPI page on shark control+devices http://www2.dpi.qld.gov.au/fishweb/2920.html#Research , http://www2.dpi.qld.gov.au/extra/pdf/fishweb/sharksafetyreport.pdf
(9) “Death or injury to marine species following capture in beach meshing (nets) and drum lines used in Shark Control Programs” . Advice to the Minister for the Environment and Heritage from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (TSSC) on Amendments to the List of Key Threatening Processes under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) 21 March 2005 , http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/ktp/shark-control-... , see also Human Society International Application to Nominate Shark Nets and Drumlines a Key Threatening process Under the EPBC Act :
http://www.hsi.org.au/protection_wildlife&habitat/images/Nominations/EPB... , see also http://www.rrrc.org.au/publications/downloads/142-JCU-Soto-2007-Status-R... ,
general species info: Fed Env Links on sharks http://www.environment.gov.au/coasts/species/sharks/index.html ,
Whales http://www.environment.gov.au/coasts/species/cetaceans/index.html ,
Dolphins http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/spratlookupspecies.pl... , Loggerhead Turtle http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicspecies.pl?taxo... ,
Flatback Turtle http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicspecies.pl?taxo... ,
Green Turtle http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicspecies.pl?taxo... ,
Leatherback Turtle http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicspecies.pl?taxo... ,
Hawksbill Turtle http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicspecies.pl?taxo... ,
Olive Ridley Tutrtle
http://www.environment.gov.au/coasts/species/turtles/oliveridley.htmlhtt...
Stingaree http://www.woodbridge.tased.edu.au/mdc/Species%20Register/class_chondric...
GBRMPA – Marine Turtles of the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area
http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/corp_site/info_services/publications/misc_pub/m... ,
Shark senses http://www.sharkattacks.com/extrodinary.htm ,
Sharks and Rays http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/55/2/371.pdf ,
Effects of Shark and Ray bycatch http://www.pacfish.org/sharkcon/documents/bonfil.html

(10) Ibid

(11) For Instance See figures of Target Species Catch and By Catch and sites concerning declining Shark Numbers , Marine Mortality Report 2000
http://203.9.184.225/publications/p01149aa.pdf/Marine_wildlife_stranding... , Qld EPA data https://www.epa.qld.gov.au/publications?id=1143 , CRC page
http://www.reef.crc.org.au/research/fishing_fisheries/statusfisheries/in... , Federal shark assessment report http://www.daff.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/17721/shark_assess_re... , National Shark plan http://www.daff.gov.au/fisheries/environment/bycatch/sharkplan , Shark Foundation figures http://www.sharkfoundation.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id... , Townsville shark catch 2006 http://www.oesr.qld.gov.au/queensland-by-theme/industry/agriculture-fore... , Science Daily Website http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061204123545.htm

Comments

the priority?

Prioritizing the lives of sharks over humans... that's just what we need to gain popular support for a genuine environmental advocacy towards conservation

shinn

______________________________
Ed, the link hidden in the above comment was disabled

Some more interesting links:

Some more interesting links:

“National Geographic News” Article on the rift between shark netting and drumline states and those that argue against it :
“Sharks Kill Surfer, Reigniting Net Debate in Australia”
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0128_050128_sharknets.html

Oceania Chondrichthyan Society
www.oceaniasharks.org.au

http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=epa+qld+bull+sharks&meta=

Recent Sydney shark attacks come under question

Recent Sydney shark attacks come under question
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
ABC Television 7.30 Report
Broadcast: 02/03/2009
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2009/s2505470.htm

Reporter: Kirstin Murray

After three shark attacks in as many weeks around Sydney, there has been plenty of talk about increased shark numbers. But some experts say that the rate of shark attacks in Australian waters has remained consistent for more than 50 years, and that shark numbers are actually down. So what is behind the recent spate of attacks?

Transcript
KERRY O'BRIEN, PRESENTER: That other force of nature, the shark, is back in the headlines in east coast waters where people have been lulled into some sense of security after decades of netting at the most popular beaches.

And after three maulings in as many weeks around Sydney, there's been plenty of talk about increased shark numbers. But some experts say that the rate of shark attacks in Australian waters has remained consistent for more than 50 years, and that shark numbers are actually down. So what's behind the recent spate of attacks? Kristin Murray reports.

KIRSTIN MURRAY, REPORTER: It's the sound no swimmer ever wants to hear. But after three shark attacks in as many weeks, and many more sightings, Sydney's beach-goers are treating this warning siren with new respect.

MICHAEL BROWN, SURFWATCH: Three years ago we recorded one great white off Sydney beaches. Last year we recorded seven great whites off Sydney beaches, and unbelievably this year we're up to 27 great whites already.

VOLKER KLEMM, AVALON SURF LIFE SAVER: It's definitely the busiest time of the year. The water's the warmest it's ever going to get, and so there's a lot of swimmers out there.

KIRSTIN MURRAY: There was no time to sound the alarm yesterday. Andrew Lindop was catching waves with his father off Avalon Beach just before dawn, the most popular time for surfers. But under the dimly lit sky, the 15-year-old couldn't see the shark approach.

VOLKER KLEMM: His dad is a very experienced surf lifesaver in our club and he already had the boy stabilised. He already had the leg rope of his surfboard wrapped around his upper thigh as a tourniquet and stopped the blood flow.

KIRSTIN MURRAY: The Avalon attack is the latest in a series on Sydney's shores, and waters long considered safe are now being viewed in a new light.

Less than three weeks ago a navy diver lost an arm and a leg after he was attacked in a training exercise in Sydney Harbour, the first such incident in more than a decade.

At dusk the following day a great white struck a surfer off the city's most popular tourist beach. It was the first shark attack at Bondi in more than 80 years. Experts say there's no obvious reason for the spate of attacks, but are adamant the shark population hasn't increased.

BARRY BRUCE, RESEARCH SCIENTIST, CSIRO: Statistics are thrown out the door when it comes to shark attack. Shark attack is high profile, low risk and low frequency, but often with high consequence. So it does grab our attention.

KIRSTIN MURRAY: The most common theory as to why Sydney's become a favoured destination for these large predators centres on an increase in their feed.

BEN WOTTON, MANLY SURF LIFESAVING CLUB: There's less pollution in the water, that means there's more for the small bait fish to eat, particularly close in to cities. The small bait finish bring in the fish that feed on them and obviously the larger predators follow those in.

VIC PEDDEMORS, SHARK BIOLOGIST: Be that as it may, the shark numbers are still very slow. You can't walk from one side of the harbour to the other on the backs of sharks, although some people would believe that is the case.

KIRSTIN MURRAY: CSIRO scientist Barry Bruce agrees. After three decades tracking great whites along the coastline, he says there's no simple explanation for their movements.

BARRY BRUCE: At the moment we see no evidence of any dramatic change in the environmental signals that would indicate that something has definitely changed for this particular year.

KIRSTIN MURRAY: What has surprised many is that the latest attacks occurred inside shark nets. During the past 50 years there's only been one recorded fatality on NSW beaches protected by nets, and many more attacks prevented.

VIC PEDDEMORS: Unfortunately at this stage we don't have any alternative to shark nets. We believe shark nets are the most effective way to protect beach users.

KIRSTIN MURRAY: Ben Wotton's a lifelong member of the Manly Life Saving Club, and remembers the days of shark watch towers.

BEN WOTTON: You may not need to go to the cost of building a specific mannable tower, that you could put a decent high res webcam on a local building - and most beaches would have that - or on a pole of the appropriate height, which would give you at least the ability to view in all lighting conditions.

KIRSTIN MURRAY: Michael Brown runs a voluntary aerial patrol and says the Government should do away with shark nets and invest in new technologies

MICHAEL BROWN: There are sonar based systems that can detect a shark before it gets within one kilometre of a beach, giving lifesavers the opportunity to get out, inspect whether it is a threat or not and then make an educated decision whether they want to evacuate a beach.

VIC PEDDEMORS: We've looked at various alternatives, we've looked at using electrical barriers, for example, unfortunately that technology isn't quite ready yet.

KIRSTIN MURRAY: Despite the headlines, it seems swimmers and surfers won't be deterred.

BEN WOTTON: You've got more probability of being hit by a bus crossing the road on your way to work or home than you do of being bitten by a shark. The odds are massively against you being bitten by a shark anywhere in Australia.

KERRY O'BRIEN: That report from Kirstin Murray

Shark hysteria obscures the facts about beach meshing‏

[Greens-Media] Shark hysteria obscures the facts about beach meshing‏
From: media-bounces [at] lists [dot] greens [dot] org [dot] au on behalf of Catherine Coorey (Catherine [dot] Coorey [at] parliament [dot] nsw [dot] gov [dot] au)
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2009 3:48:13 AM
To: media [at] lists [dot] greens [dot] org [dot] au

Ian Cohen MLC. Media Release. 2 March 2009.Shark hysteria obscures the facts about beach meshing

“Hysteria surrounding the recent shark attacks in Sydney and thecontinual circulating of myths and incorrect information isirresponsible”, says NSW Greens MLC Ian Cohen.

“As a surfer myself,I have the utmost concern for the victims of the recent attacks andappreciate the gravity of their injuries.”

“However, despite the scare-mongering, the reality is that sharkpopulations are still in decline and that meshing our beaches is at bestuseless in protecting swimmers from sharks and at worst is killing alarge number of harmless and endangered marine animals.”

“Both Bondi and Avalon, where the two beach attacks took place, aremeshed beaches; further proof that the meshing of NSW’s beaches is awaste of time and only serves to kill many other marine species that arenot dangerous to humans. It should be noted that of the sharks thathave been caught in the netting, more that 30% per cent are on the beachside of the net,” says Ian Cohen.

“Minister for Primary Industries Ian McDonald continues to defend theshark meshing system which has been in place since the 1930s when therun-off from Homebush abattoir spilled into Malabar. There is no proofthat the meshing system has prevented a single shark attack since thattime. Mr McDonald should acknowledge that the meshing system serves nopurpose but to give the people of NSW a sense of security — securitythat these two recent attacks have shown to be false.”

“On Sydney’s beaches and in the harbour the increase in thepopulation and the increase in tourist populations compared with thenumber of attacks recorded shows the risk of shark attack fatality hasactually decreased over the last three decades. You are far more likelyto be die in your car on the way to the beach”, says Ian Cohen,“and, as these recent attacks prove, there are no guarantees that meshing will save you from a shark attack.”

“I call on Ian McDonald to abandon meshing our beaches and look atalternatives. Electronic shark repellent technology, life guard observation and increased use of Coastwatch observation flights –which the Government has scaled down – could better protect bothswimmers and marine species.”

“The nets do not extend across the whole beach or from the oceanfloor to the water’s surface. There are large gaps between the watersurface and the top of the net that would allow most sharks to avoid capture. The nets are more about creating a perception of safety than protecting swimmers.”

“The Australian Shark Attack File, maintained by Taronga Zoo, showsthat in the last 50 years there have been only 56 human fatalities (1.12per year) in Australian waters from shark attack. Given the hundreds ofthousands of people who swim at our beaches, harbours and rivers, thisis a very small number. The greatest threats to beachgoers are hazardousrips, treacherous surf and skin cancer."

More information: Catherine Coorey 0402 315 345 or Ian Cohen: 0409 989466 Catherine CooreyMedia Advisor to Ian Cohen MLCThe GreensNSW Parliament

‘Punishing’ sharks an irresponsible precedent‏

[Greens-Media] ‘Punishing’ sharks an irresponsible precedent‏
From: media-bounces [at] lists [dot] greens [dot] org [dot] au on behalf of Scott Hickie (Scott [dot] Hickie [at] parliament [dot] nsw [dot] gov [dot] au)
Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2009 4:17:16 AM
To: media [at] lists [dot] greens [dot] org [dot] au

Ian Cohen MLCMedia Release 25 February 2009 ‘Punishing’ sharks an irresponsible precedent

“The Daily Telegraph’s attempt to catch a shark in Sydney Harbouris a stupid stunt that simply generates hysteria and fear”, says IanCohen, Greens MLC.

“What was the Telegraph trying to do by hooking this shark and tryingto take it out of its habitat – send a message to the shark population?"

“Their story suggests that their reporter caught the shark that bit a navy diver recently because it was of a similar length and looked thesame. It is ludicrous to suggest that it is the same shark. Since when do we punish wild animals for doing what they do in their own habitat?”

“The Greens have been campaigning for years to protect NSW fish populations and the marine environment so that the habitats of manyspecies can regenerate from perilously low levels, notably the Grey Nurse shark which is near extinction. The Greens have also vigorouslyopposed the netting of NSW beaches as being of little use in protecting people against sharks whilst killing many other species.”

“By hunting down this “man-eater”, the Telegraph is encouragingits readers to go out and catch sharks; an irresponsible stunt that willonly hurt shark populations we have been trying to restore.”

“The Telegraph is encouraging a form of shark vigilantism, suggestingcatching sharks is an acceptable practice and setting a precedent forevery other shark hunting ‘hero’, although hunting from a power boat with high tech equipment is hardly the stuff of heroes,” said MrCohen. “

“Does anyone think that catching one shark will make Sydney Harbour a safer place to swim? If people want to be one hundred per cent safe and swim in Sydney Harbour, there are a number of dedicated harbour pools. People are thousands of times more likely to die in boating or drowning accidents on the harbour than from being bitten by a shark. Humans needto accept that if we venture into areas where there are wild animalsthere are risks involved.”

“The only encouraging part of the Telegraph’s story was that thewaters around Clifton Gardens are teeming with fish — and that theshark got away.”

ENDS Further information: Catherine Coorey 0402 315 345 or Ian Cohen 0409989 466

'No evidence' of more sharks in NSW

'No evidence' of more sharks in NSW
12:56 AEST Sun Feb 15 2009
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/752302/no-evidence-of-more-sharks-in...

There is no evidence of increased shark numbers in NSW despite cleaner waterways around Sydney, NSW Deputy Premier Carmel Tebbutt says.

NSW shark fishermen are regularly hauling up to 100 sharks per night but they will be banned from hunting sharks until July due to new fishing quotas imposed by the state government, News Limited reports.

The claim comes as a navy diver and a surfer recover in hospital from separate savage shark attacks in Sydney Harbour and Bondi Beach last week.

Ms Tebbutt confirmed Sydney Harbour was less polluted now than it was two years ago, but declined to link the cleaner waters to greater shark numbers.

"Our waterways in general are much cleaner. We know there are more fish in the harbour because commercial fishing hasn't been allowed since we had the dioxin issues. So, there is a view that the greater number of fish in the harbour may mean that more sharks are coming into the harbour," Ms Tebbutt told reporters in Sydney on Sunday.

"There's no evidence that there's an increase in shark numbers in general in NSW but it's something that the minister for primary industries and fisheries (Ian Macdonald) is looking at very closely."

She said the government needed to be "guided by the science" in relation to shark issues.

Environmentalist and Clean Up Australia founder Ian Kiernan said fish numbers were increasing with the ban on fishing in Sydney Harbour.

"Sharks have always been here, you've only got to go back to the Aboriginal history of the colony," Mr Kiernan said.

"It is their territory."

However, he said, beachgoers needed to take responsibility for their actions in the water.

"The irresponsibility of surfing at dawn or dusk is that you're asking for trouble."

Hacks - hack job

Behold! the magic dissappearing dolphin, turtle and dugong death figures trick.

Compare this media release below, with what was printed as a letter in the Townsville Bulletin Saturday 31/1/09:

I sent-
"I am wondering why , pray tell, there has been no hue and cry over revelations in the Australian (Jan 20) about the numbers of Dolphins , Turtles and Dugongs killed by the Qld “Labor” government last year in its shark “control” program . It was stated, and I quote :“Thirty-one dolphins, 45 turtles, two dugongs and one humpback whale were also caught in the nets and on drumlines last year. Of those, seven dolphins, 36 turtles and the whale survived.”( Large bite taken out of Queensland's shark population , Sarah Elks ) .

26 dead Dolphins , 9 dead Turtles and 2 dead Dugong. There was no mention of how many harmless sharks were part of the numbers of sharks killed .

If the Japanese had done something like this, the country would be up in arms.

You can see how these nets and drum lines are indiscriminate and the system needs to be changed to a less wasteful , non lethal approach based on shark repelling technology."

Printed-

"I am wondering why there has been no hue and cry over revelations the numbers of Dolphins , Turtles and Dugongs killed by the Qld “Labor” government last year in its shark “control” program .

There was no mention of how many harmless sharks were part of the numbers of sharks killed .

If the Japanese had done something like this, the country would be up in arms. How can the Labor government continue to justify this ?

You can see how these nets and drum lines are indiscriminate and the system needs to be changed to a less wasteful , non lethal approach based on shark repelling technology."

Very annoying.....

decline in numbers at Bribie Island

Northern Times (Bribie Island area)

Shark warning for swimmers
by Glenn Roberts
http://northern-times.whereilive.com.au/news/story/shark-warning-for-swi...

SWIMMERS are being warned sharks could be attracted to Woorim Beach by sand dredging, which is due to start this month.
A Primary Industries and Fisheries Department spokesman said sharks fed on the bait fish which were drawn to the murky water created by dredging.
``If people are swimming there they should exercise more caution,’’ the spokesman said.
The sharks most likely to be attracted were whaler species and tiger sharks.
The warning comes just before the 18 drum lines (baited hooks) which protect the beach are due to be moved to allow the pumping of sand on to the beach.
They will be shifted north and south of their current positions from January 27 to about February 13.
``It probably won’t mean a great deal of difference (to the protection given),’’ the spokesman said.
Statistics released this week showed the largest shark captured in shark control equipment off the Sunshine Coast in 2008 was a 4m sandbar whaler caught off Bribie Island.
It was among 79 sharks caught off the Sunshine Coast during the year; 25 more than in 2007.
Primary Industries and Fisheries Minister Tim Mulherin said the wet conditions at the start of 2008 contributed to the increased catch as the sharks became more active chasing food flushed out by the rain.
“We would expect this bull shark population to continue to grow as the canal network on the Sunshine Coast continues to expand,’’ he said.
``The recent summer rainfall will mean the sharks will become more active in the murky waters as food sources move around.’’
Between 1997-98 and 2002-03 annual catches on the Sunshine Coast ranged from 102 to 144.
Since 2003-04 the catch has been between 29 and 87.

Tips for avoiding sharks:
- Do not swim or surf in murky waters.
- Swim or surf only at patrol led beaches and between the flags.
- Do not swim or surf after dusk, at night or before dawn.
- Do not swim in or near mouths of estuaries, artificial canals and lakes.
- Do not swim near schools of fish or where fish are being cleaned.
- Do not swim near or interfere with shark control equipment.
- Do not swim with animals.

Not nearly conservational enough! Personal curiosity...

Glenn,

I apologise for my intrusion on your naturalist page.. encouraging all the good things in life..... I am searching for a childhood friend... bearing your name... Lee, Kimberley and Katherine are hopefully your brothers and sisters.. Rosemary and Terry are names you may recall...... I have not seen you since we reunited (on a plane between Darwin to Adelaide. Happy birthday for yesterday..... I still remember! I live in QLD (only 3 hours away!) Would love to hear from you!

Cheers

Stephanie
sjlaffin [at] live [dot] com

No relation

No relation I'm afraid , dont know any of them .

And in case anyone gets confused by the reference to naturalist above , I am not the sort of bloke that runs naked through the bush or on beaches .....good luck to the people who are......just in case.

Pat

This article made it into the paper

Here are 2 links to a scanned copy of the Townsville Bulletin 19/01/09 p13- who published this article as a letter. It gnerated about %40 of a tabloid page . The link that has bottom at the end shows the article , the other the by- line.

http://cynicismcentral.nigelsim.org/thisarticlesmediatownsvillebulletinp...

http://cynicismcentral.nigelsim.org/thisarticlesmediatownsvillebulletinp...

Expert slams shark control

Cross refernce www.cynicismcentral.org/node/53

Expert slams shark control
Townsville Bulletin
http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/article/2009/01/21/34011_news.html

DANIEL BATEMAN

January 21st, 2009

A NORTH Queensland scientist says the State Government's shark control program is a waste of time and money during stinger season.

Marine biologist and filmmaker Richard Fitzpatrick, whose documentary on shark conservation is premiering on the Discovery Channel on Sunday night, said control measures such as drumlines and netting were not necessary on the North's beaches as people did not swim at the beach.

"It's really not an issue for us up here in North Queensland, because we aren't in the water at all during summer, because of the box jellyfish," Mr Fitzpatrick said.

"This does beg the question, why do we have shark nets and shark control in North Queensland in the summer months?"

Shark netting unnecessarily threatened other marine animals during breeding season, he said.

"It is breeding time for lots of different animals besides sharks, like turtles, stingrays and all that kind of stuff," Mr Fitzpatrick said.

"I think it's just a waste of time and taxpayers' money having them out during stinger season."

Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries' shark control program manager Tony Ham said the shark control measures were a necessary precaution for people who swam in the sea during stinger season.

"Lots of people who live in North Queensland actually take precautions against stingers," Mr Ham said.

"There are stinger suits available and people wear pantyhose and all that sort of stuff.

"A lot of those people swim outside of stinger enclosures.

"The Government's position is that while the stinger enclosures are there and they are great, not everybody makes that choice, and certainly we wouldn't be forcing anyone to make that choice.

"While people do swim outside of stinger enclosures, programs are necessary for their protection."

The DPIF removed shark nets from Magnetic Island in the late nineties, in response to the accidental catch of dugongs.

"Yes, we do occasionally have non-target species in nets," Mr Ham said.

"The Government's got some processes in place, with acoustics and alarms for dolphins and whales throughout the state, including the North. And we've got the hotline number for people reporting entangled animals."

Mr Fitzpatrick's documentary, Mysteries of the Shark Coast, used underwater animal cameras and remote cameras to record shark behaviour and gather new insight into the secretive life of sharks, and to discover the reasons behind a decline in shark populations.

"The sharks are being fished down at, if not the same, a higher rate than the fish are themselves," he said.

"We're reducing the entire oceanic food chain from the plankton to the whale.

"That whole idea of taking away the fish and leaving the sharks starving, and they're picking on humans is just ridiculous. We're fishing across the entire food chain, and sharks probably get hit more than anything else at the moment, at a higher rate."

Dolphins and Turtles Killed

Check out the numbers of dolphins and Turtles caught or Killed here in Qld.
...................if the Japanese were doing it?......................
________________________________________________________________________________
Large bite taken out of Queensland's shark population
Sarah Elks | January 20, 2009
Article from: The Australian
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24935535-5006786,00.html

QUEENSLAND'S shark control program caught 578 sharks last year -- 18 more than in 2007, but well below the figures seen over a decade ago.

Despite a series of shark attacks around the country this summer, and anecdotal evidence of a sharp spike in the number of great whites in Australian waters, the number of sharks captured as a result of the Queensland program is in decline.

But authorities have stood by the program, highlighting the need to protect swimmers even if other marine life dies as a result.

Following the release of the figures yesterday, which showed that among the catch was a 5.3m-long tiger shark, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries shark control program manager Tony Ham said the increase on 2007 figures was not a significant jump.

"This is just a minor fluctuation in the numbers," Mr Ham said. "There was a little bit more rain around, particularly in southeast Queensland, and this always impacts on the movement of fish and the movement of sharks following."

Queensland Museum fish expert Jeff Johnson said the number of sharks had fallen markedly since the shark control program began. "There's a fairly clear down trend in the number of sharks caught in the program," he said. "The program has been running for many decades and the nets have been quite effective in reducing the local population of sharks."

Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries data show a total of 610 sharks were caught off Queensland in 1998 and that 1025 were caught in 1988.

Mr Johnson said there was anecdotal evidence of more sharks in close coastal waters in recent times, but this did not indicate an increase in overall shark numbers.

"The conditions have been quite favourable for sharks in the inshore waters (recently), so you're probably getting a concentration of them moving into coastal waters with the warm weather and wet weather," he said.

Last year, the biggest shark caught in Queensland waters was the 5.3m tiger shark at Lamberts Beach in Mackay, central Queensland, in September.

That shark was 60cm larger than the biggest caught in 2007 -- a 4.7m tiger shark also caught off Mackay.

Most sharks caught last year -- 207 -- were tiger sharks, compared with 277 tiger sharks caught in 1998. Of the total 578 sharks caught with the use of nets and drumlines last year, 137 were found alive. All but 23 of those were killed by state government contractors. The others, deemed harmless, were released.

Thirty-one dolphins, 45 turtles, two dugongs and one humpback whale were also caught in the nets and on drumlines last year. Of those, seven dolphins, 36 turtles and the whale survived.

Meanwhile, authorities in far north Queensland were yesterday trying to trap the second crocodile in a week spotted off Mornington Island, in the Gulf of Carpentaria.

Environmental Protection Agency acting director of wildlife management Michael Devery said several crocodiles had been spotted by the community near where people swim in the Appel Channel in mid-December.

ABC story: Sharks, not humans, most at risk in ocean

Sharks, not humans, most at risk in ocean
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/01/17/2468318.htm

At risk: the shark population is declining. (farm1.static.flickr.com)
Three shark attacks in Australia in two days in the past week sparked a media frenzy, but sharks are more at risk in the ocean than people, with humans killing millions of sharks each year.

Sharks are the top of the marine food chain, a powerful predator which has no match in its watery realm, until humans enter the ocean.

Australia's Shark Research Institute says commercial fishing and a desire for Asian shark fin soup sees up to 100 million sharks, even protected endangered species of sharks, slaughtered around the world each year.

Yet in contrast, sharks do not seem to like the taste of humans. Very few shark attacks involve the shark actually eating the human, unlike a land-based predator like a lion or tiger.

The Shark Research Institute says on its website that most of the incidents in the Florida-based global shark attack file "have nothing to do with predation".

Unlike fat seals - the preferred meal of sharks like the great white - humans are bony with not much fat. Sharks use various sensors to hunt their prey and a quick bite will tell it whether it has found a good meal.

Usually when a shark bites a human it then swims off. Unfortunately for humans, sharks are big and people are small, so a large shark bite can mean death from rapid loss of blood.

"Sharks are opportunistic feeders. They hear us in the water, we sound like a thrashing fish or animal in the water, and they just react to that instinctively and go to take a bite," marine analyst Greg Pickering said on Wednesday.

Australia and Florida

According to the latest figures by the global shark attack file, there was only one fatal shark attack in 2007. It took place in New Caledonia in the South Pacific. The mean number of deaths between 2000 and 2007 was five a year.

"You have more chance of being killed driving to the beach," said John West, the curator of the Australian shark attack file at Sydney's Taronga Zoo.

In fact, the number of fatal attacks around the world has been falling during the 20th century, due to advances in beach safety, medical treatment and public awareness of shark habitats.

The bulk of shark attacks do not happen in Australian waters, despite its shark reputation, but in North American waters. Half of the world's shark attacks occur in the United States, and one third of the world's attacks are in Florida waters.

In 2007, there were 50 shark attacks in US waters, compared with 13 in Australia in the same year. None were fatal.

The big difference between Florida and Australia is that Australia has much bigger sharks and therefore more fatal attacks. From 1990 to 2007, Australia had 19 fatal attacks, Florida only four.

The Australian shark attack file says there has been a total of 56 fatal shark attacks in Australia in the past 50 years, or an average of about one a year.

The last fatal attack occurred in December 2008, when a great white shark attacked a 51-year-old man while he was snorkelling off a beach south of Perth in Western Australia.

So, is it safe to go back in the water?

Shark attacks are on the rise worldwide, but according to the international shark attack file, that doesn't mean there is an increased rate of shark attacks.

The file on its website that as the world population increases and interest in aquatic recreation rises, "we realistically should expect increases in the number of shark attacks".

Sharks in decline

But while more humans enter the ocean each year and for longer periods of time, the shark population is declining, theoretically reducing the chances of a shark-human encounter.

"As a result, short-term trends in the number of shark attacks, up or down, must be viewed with caution," says the file.

So, if shark numbers are falling, why are there more sightings of sharks off Australia's beaches? Surfwatch Australia, which conducts aerial patrols of Sydney beaches, estimates shark sightings have risen 50 to 80 per cent in recent years.

Wildlife officials say cleaner beach water means sharks are chasing food closer to shore. Sydney beaches were closed this month when hammerheads started feeding on squid near swimmers.

But only about two dozen shark species are considered potentially dangerous to humans because of their size and teeth.

The great white, bull, tiger and hammerhead sharks are among the most aggressive and responsible for most attacks in Australia.

Great whites can grow to 5.5 metres in length, weigh up to 1,000 kilograms and have the biting power to lift a car.

Australian scientists have recorded the bite power of a 3.2-metre shark as equivalent to 1.5 tonnes of pressure.

The aggressive-looking grey nurse shark, with its piercing eyes, pointy nose and protruding teeth, is as timid as a cat and will only attack if provoked.

But its fierce appearance has seen it hunted to the point where it is now endangered and colonies of grey nurse sharks off Sydney are protected.

There are 30 sharks, including the great white, on the International Union for Conservation of Nature's threatened species list.

Australia's Nature Conservation Council has launched a 'Save Our Last Sharks' campaign.

"Sharks need our help now and we cannot let our fear push them to the brink of extinction," says the Council's Ben Birt.

- Reuters

NATURE CONSERVATION COUNCIL OF NSW "SAVE OUR LAST SHARKS" CAMPAIGN WEBSITE
http://nccnsw.org.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=5...

Link to whales caught in nets stories

Here is a link to articles and stories showing how whales get caught in shark nets

http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&cr=countryAU&q=whale+%2B+shark+net...

Types of sharks killed in Qld program 97-08

WWF links to sharks decline

www.wwf.org.au links to releases on the issue of decline in sharks numbers , over fishing and non action by government ETC

http://wwf.org.au/search?site_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwwf.org.au%2Fsearch&searc...

shark decline links

http://www.google.com.au/search?q=shark+declines+control+program+queensl...

You can also go to the www.hsi.org.au site to get their info , also check their links in the above article for the info on species affected by nets and drumlines.

Article:More sharks? Maybe, but not in net terms

More sharks? Maybe, but not in net terms
Caroline Overington | January 15, 2009
Article from: The Australian
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,24914444-30417,00.html

GOVERNMENTS do not want the public to know shark numbers have increased by more than 400 per cent in the past decade so people do not panic, and to save Australia's reputation as a safe place to swim.

So goes the view of several experienced shark spotters in a debate that is now fiercely political.

They say they have evidence of growing numbers of "well-fed, wide-bodied" sharks near our shores, but other experts say no such thing can be proved because there is no reliable data on shark numbers in Australian waters, now or ever.

There has been a ban on killing the great white in Australian waters for something like 10 years.

The ban was designed to allow shark numbers to recover. It makes sense, then, that shark numbers have recovered, and are increasing.

Michael Brown of Surfwatch Australia, which conducts thrice-weekly helicopter flights over NSW beaches, said: "The Government has a huge sook when you bring it up but I'd say they are increasing 400 per cent."

Mr Brown said governments did not have any interest in publicising the problem "because of the effect on tourism, and the government revenues, and maybe the hysteria that goes along with it."

Adam Smith, who last year instituted the Great Australian Shark Count, has used for the past 18 months two methods to count sharks: opportunistic counting, where divers and fishermen report shark sightings to his website; and dedicated counts, on four selected weekends.

"We've seen 11,000 sightings since we started counting, and when we mapped out the project, we thought we might see 2000 sharks," Dr Smith said.

Tony Peake of the Shark Research Institute in Western Australia said the issue had become "very politicised". "You can't say there are more sharks, because Australia is a tourism place, and our lives are based around the shoreline, and you can't say to people, 'Oh, you can't go for a swim'. It's bad for the business of the country," Dr Peake said. "Basically, there's a lot of money in being green. If you say you're going to save something, the Government will give you money, and if that means more sharks, they don't care.

John Stevens, a senior principal marine research scientist with the CSIRO, said, "Basically, the answer is we don't know" how many sharks are out there. "Sharks come into the media in summer because there are more people on the beach, more people swimming."

Vic Peddemors, shark biologist for NSW Department of Primary Industries, said that since the 1990s there had been no real increase in sharks caught in the nets that protect popular beaches in NSW and Queensland.

cynicalrandomness