www.cynicismcentral.org
TOWNSVILLE V8 TRACK TENDER AWARDED TO LABOR DONORS , PATTERN BETRAYS WIFF OF SCANDAL
There are a number of issues that need to be raised about the conduct of the Qld government in relation to the proposed Breakwater Quays canal estate development in Townsville (1), the sale of the old Railway Land and land on the South Bank of Ross Creek Townsville to Leighton Holdings and Devine Ltd for 25 m (2), and the awarding of the tender to construct Townsville’s V8 race track at Reid Park in the same area to Leighton Contractors.
In relation to the canal estate ,they firstly fast tracked the process, then gave preferred developer status , $15 000 000 in public funding and ultimately passed a law overriding all state and local environmental and planning laws for this development.
To understand the reasoning behind this it is useful to look at the annual returns on the AEC website for Qld Labor. All of the developers are massive donors to the labor party. For instance, Tabcorp gave $46650(3), Mirvac (4) $91250, Trinity (linked to Mirvac) $113 392 (5), Consolidated Properties $71 480 (6) and City Pacific $25 850 (7).
In relation to the sale of the railway land, though it was bought for 25 m, it is reported to be a 1 Billion dollar development, so Leighton Holdings and Devine Ltd stand to make a killing. Leighton Contractors who have been awarded the tender to construct the V8 track is a subsidiary of Leighton holdings. The combined total of donations made to the Qld Labor Party since 1998 is $129 552 on my reading of the AEC website. Devine Ltd has donated $67 730 since 2004.
Do people honestly believe they donated for altruistic reasons? Do people honestly believe they don’t expect, and haven’t been granted, quid pro quo? You would have to have rocks in your head if you don’t believe that the donations did not colour the decision making processes of labor dominated state government and ultimately now federal aswell.
It is clear that the Qld Labor party is using the sale of public land, the granting of tenders, development approvals with the passing of legislation overriding state and local environmental and planning laws as a means of obtaining developer donations to assist them in staying in power.
This is a shameful state of affairs, and it does not bode well for the laid back life style of Townsville or protection of the Great Barrier Reef World heritage Area and the coastline.
Labor needs to be removed from government in Qld, how anyone in the Labor Party can go to the people with a straight face is beyond me .The system if place now is nothing but legalised corruption.
People interested in who is throwing money around should use the following search engine: http://fadar.aec.gov.au/arwdefault.asp?submissionid=9.
Choose the year of the left of the web page. Then click on search. Choose “Labor Party (State of Queensland) in the list, then type the developer name in the donor box and hit search. If the donation does not come up click “all other returns” where the donor is mentioned.
(1) http://www.townsville-port.com.au/component/option,com_content/task,view...
(2) Business Spectator, “Devine, Leighton plan $1b Townsville project”
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Devine-Leighton-plan-...
(3) Tabcorp $30 000 200 3-04 p8 , $1650 2003-04 section 2 p 8 http://fadar.aec.gov.au/Returns/5/P2179.pdf
(4) Mirvac $15 000 2000-2001 p 3 , http://fadar.aec.gov.au/Returns/2/P0038.pdf
2001-2002 $10 000 p2, $5500 2001-02 section 2 part b, http://fadar.aec.gov.au/Returns/3/P2071.pdf
$8740 2002-03 p 5, http://fadar.aec.gov.au/Returns/4/P2116.pdf
(5) Trinity Property Trust distributions $21552 p4 2001-2002 amendment 2 ,http://fadar.aec.gov.au/Returns/3/P2071A02.pdf , $29513 2006-07 p 7, $24 027 2003-04 section 2 p9
http://fadar.aec.gov.au/Returns/5/P2179.pdf, $38300 2005-06 p5 http://fadar.aec.gov.au/Returns/8/P2471.pdf
(6) Consolidated properties $2000 other than as donations 2000-2001 section 2 p2 , $5500 2001-02 section 2 http://fadar.aec.gov.au/Returns/2/P0038.pdf part b p2 , $9980 2002-03 p3 ,
http://fadar.aec.gov.au/Returns/4/P2116.pdf , $30 000 2003-2004 p 3, $10750 2003-04 section 2 p 3
http://fadar.aec.gov.au/Returns/5/P2179.pdf , $13250 2006 -07p3
(7) City Pacific $3850 2005-06 p 3
http://fadar.aec.gov.au/arwNamedOnOtherLst.asp?SubmissionID=5&ClientID=2...
$22000 2004-05
http://fadar.aec.gov.au/arwNamedOnOtherLst.asp?SubmissionID=7&ClientID=3...
Comments
Lieghtons Labor Lobbyists
Ex-Labor lobbyists may be forced to reveal success fees
By Steven Wardill
Courier Mail
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,25810254-3102,00.html
July 21, 2009 12:00am
QUEENSLAND'S Labor-dominated lobbying fraternity could be forced to reveal the lucrative "success fees" they pocket for securing government contracts.
Premier Anna Bligh yesterday insisted she would prefer outlawing the questionable practice altogether, but legal advice indicated such a move may be difficult.
Ms Bligh said the next best option would be to force lobbyists to reveal the exact amounts of success fees paid in the hope public exposure would stamp out the payments.
"Frankly, I am seeking advice about whether it is possible to outlaw or prohibit (success fees)," she said.
"But in the absence of that by shining a light on it, what I hope is it will stop.
"People will think this is not worth it and that they won't do it any more because you don't have to do that to get a government contract."
The quest to outlaw the practice comes after The Courier-Mail revealed in January that two senior Labor figures shared a lucrative success fee for helping a Thiess-led consortium win the Airport Link contract.
Former politicians Terry Mackenroth and Con Sciacca are believed to have snared a $500,000 windfall for what they described as simply providing "strategic advice".
The Government has since introduced a register of lobbyists which the industry must adhere to if they want to meet with Ms Bligh and any of her ministers.
The forms lobbyists must complete were recently altered, so that the firms not only had to reveal their clients, but which ones had specifically paid them success fees. Among those firms which have completed the new forms and admit to profiting off success fees are several with strong Labor links.
They include former transport minister Steve Bredhauer's consulting business which was paid by Leighton Contractors.
Other firms which listed success fees included Hawker Britton and Rowland along with former Queensland Liberal Party president Con Galtos' Tesabay Investments.
Many of the 66 registered lobbying firms are yet to complete the new requirement.
Ms Bligh said the amounts of some success fees were "well beyond community expectation" and the practice was completely unnecessary.
More Developer donations for canal estate
This is getting beyond a joke in relation to Qld labor taking money from developers and then doing their bidding.
Article "Gore blimey" , Townsville Bulletin 25/10/08 , Magpie column (Townsvilles local Saturday Scandal Page)
http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/article/2008/10/25/18681_magpie.html
Gore blimey
MALCOLM WEATHERUP
October 25th, 2008
IN A city that is accustomed to the sound of parades and brass bands tootling stirring tunes, perhaps we didn't pay enough attention to the latest sound of approaching serried ranks and marching feet getting louder and louder.
The boys from Lavarack doing another proud tour around the block? Maybe some of the emergency services around the place getting their due recognition with a parade? Maybe even Capt Snooze leading a group of Papua New Guinea troops to display his special PNG `10th Anniversary of Independence' medal to both of his adoring throng? Nope, folks, that marching sound we should've more carefully noted was the sound of the White Shoe Brigade trudging northwards along the pot-holed Bruce Highway.
And they've arrived here all right, and they are seeking no less than the Freedom of the City. Freedom to do whatever they like, it would seem, even if it's possibly of negative value to us, the poor benighted mugs who'll have to keep living here once the White Shoes have disappeared back south to their counting houses.
If you're feeling a little dizzy, it's because of the all the massive spin around the place, with the arrival in town of one Craig Gore.
Mr Gore is a developer who wants to build the controversial, and in some – indeed most – quarters, stridently opposed canal estate on the `duck pond', that enclosed water in front of Jupiters scheduled to be reclaimed as part of the ocean terminal project.
Gore Blimey breezed into town during the week to hype the widely rejected idea of the project.
Now, The Magpie is yet to hear all the arguments and possible solutions, and takes no side on the issue. But what this old bird does find more than a tad tedious is self-interested folks lobbing here with some tailor-made plan to set we rubes, hicks and yokels right about the error of our ways.
It would appear one of those errors was to elect our current council by a thumping margin.
At least that is the way it would seem, because Mr Gore said in one interview that `our research shows that eight out of 10 Townsvilleans want the project (what?!), and six out of 10 want the project with the residential component'.
"I think the council has an alternate agenda that doesn't really relate to the development, and ultimately at the end of the day, I think the Premier, Anna Bligh, has made her case very clear, she wants this project to go ahead, it's a good project for North Queensland and it's a good project for Townsville," he said.
Then there was this astounding bit of regal dismissiveness from the battlements of Castle Gore Blimey: "So I think ultimately the State Government will not be deterred by a local council."
Hmmm, that council would be like sort of, us, wouldn't it? Our representatives?
So cop that, you yokels, in fact why bother voting, we're apparently to get our riding orders – yet again – from down south.
One trusts Gore Blimey will grace us with details of his quoted (and eyebrow-raising) research, as in how, when and where it was done. Perhaps he may also deign to give we great unwashed an explanation as to why the Government has already said it `puts great weight by what any local council wants' and suggested it would rarely go against the community's wishes.
As regarding some secret agenda by the council, His Goreship may like to take a teeny peek at the last election figures, cast after a campaign that prominently featured the ocean terminal project. Everybody wants the ocean terminal and bugger all wanted the enormously problematic canal estate. But Mr Gore will certainly be able to at least put his case to Anna Bligh. Surely that's the least a fella could expect when four of his companies (Atkinson Gore Group Pty Ltd JE Atkinson & Associates Pty Ltd Consolidated Construction Group Pty Ltd; and Big State Earthmoving Pty Ltd) donated a cool $200,000 – 50 grand each – to the Labor Party in 2006/07.
Details of Mr Gore's undoubtedly altruistic donations to Labor in the last financial year, if any, probably won't be publicly available until next year. Oh, dear, who would a premier be? Well, we are told we'll know the poor dear's decision some time next month.
The Magpie believes in the innocence of this world and cannot conceive of devious and dastardly deals suspected by others. But he whiffed the odour of rodent when at least one or two councillors, mid-interview about the canal estate, hinted, that it would be great to meet with the Premier to talk that and other issues, such as more funding for the financially disastrous amalgamation process. Uh-oh, this surely couldn't mean the council would use its ultimate verdict on the canal estate as a bargaining chip, with a change of heart on the issue in order to get the much-needed – and deserved – extra amalgamation finance?
Worried about such a possible U-turn in its community-mandated opposition to the duck pond project, the old bird rang David The Kid Crisafulli.
"Oh, perish the thought, not a chance, birdy, no way" was the drift of the reply.
So just remember the slogan of this column folks, "If what is written here comes to pass, remember you read it here first, and if it doesn't come to pass, that's possibly because you read it here first'.
There is another interesting sidelight. Should Gore Blimey get the thumbs-up, will Captain Snooze break yet another reported promise to the faithful?
He is said to have told a Labor branch meeting two or three years ago, to wit:"That canal development will go ahead over my dead body".
To quote The Kid `perish the thought'.
More Worried About TabCorp
I can't speak of Leighton's - but there's been some concern RE: TabCorp's involvement in the whole V8 saga.
Firstly, do you know if it's possible to dig up how much TabCorp "paid" for the "Breakwater Trust" land? It all happened very quickly and silently - suddenly went from Trust ownership to TabCorp - and within a week, TabCorp had most of it up for sale. Suspicion is that it was "gifted" to TabCorp - so that's some windfall if it was true.
Secondly, there's been speculation that the reason why the V8's MUST be at Ried Park is that it's all about closing down the Entertainment Centre. Why? Well, consider the following:
So, what's the deal? Are the V8's simply a ploy to get a Convention Centre built so TabCorp can declare the TECC "unfit for use" so it can be demolished to make "millionaires row" more attractive? Of course, if the V8's were put outside the CBD, then they could hardly justify a Convention Centre to go with it.